March 30, 2007

More Fabrication from David Yeagley

from the Bad Eagle Journal

Thank you Robert W. Welkos, Times Staff Writer! We welcome all the new readers to this site, and thank you for taking a moment to learn the facts about the piano doctor.

So this is Yeagley’s latest claim, that Comanche people had NO political structure? He doesn’t insist on “loose” political structure, or “decentralized” structure, he literally declares there was NO political structure, and has claimed as much on several occasions.

David Yeagley — “The Comanche people had no political structure” (Mar. 2007)

David Yeagley — “We were just small bands of roaming hunters, with no religion or political structure” (Feb. 2002)

However, a quick and easy search turns up many counter explanations. Once again, Yeagley is simply stretching the truth to bolster up his own fabricated image as an Indian scholar, while the facts paint an altogether different picture. So Comanches were highly mobile, great. But to use that mobility to declare them without political structure or religiousness is a real stretch of the facts.

I’d say, from a westernized POV, probably 99% of all Indian tribes had no religion, not in the way Christians think of it. But to claim the Comanches existed without political structure is absolutely bonkers. Like most tribes, Comanches had a highly developed network of extended kinship ties, which is at the heart of their political, religious and social life. Yeagley simply does not know what he is talking about, largely because he has few (if any) kinship ties into the Comanche community himself. He is an outsider Comanche wannabe.
As noted above, the political structure was loosely organized, but each band had an elected nonhereditary chief. The most famous of these was Quanah Parker) who led the Comanche on the reservation from the 1870s until his death. Comanche religious practice was very individualistic, with emphasis being laid on the male vision quest. The quest gave power to individuals but entailed restrictive practices and taboos. There were no priests and few group ceremonies. The Comanche believed in a creator spirit and its counterpart, an evil spirit, and accepted the Sun, the Earth, and the Moon as deities. The religion was animistic with natural objects and animal spirits (except for dogs and horses) having various powers. Medicine men served as intermediaries and helpers with the spirits and also served practically as curers. The Comanche had few ceremonies, but had developed or practiced the Beaver Ceremony and the Eagle Dance.
Kristine L. Jones (1998) argues that trade among indigenous peoples and between indigenous peoples and Spanish settlers in the Pampas helped in the process of state-building by fostering increased trade. Pekka Hämäläinen (1998) makes a similar argument for the role of Comanches in the southwestern Great Plains. He argues that trade with indigenous peoples helped strengthen New Mexico while also building a tribal political structure among Comanche bands.
Perhaps the best way to understand the Comanche social and political structure is to start at the bottom. While nuclear families might, for whatever reason, choose to live separately for a while, the normal Comanche residential pattern consisted of groups of related extended families. Those families formed the local, or residential, band. The bands were focused around a core extended family, whose leader was the group's chief. Whereas the local residential band was structured on kin-ship, the widest Comanche social structure—the division—was of local group, or bands, linked into political networks; in historic times in New Mexico, and apparently briefly in Texas, the divisional principal chief was "elected" from amongst the constituent local band chiefs.

Yeagley is pretending to be Comanche and pretending to be an American Indian scholar; he's got a DMA (Doctorate of Musical Arts) for playing the piano. To get his degree, he wrote a "selective" OP-ED essay on a piano piece he liked, and said nothing of definitive importance one direction or another. Yeagley's thesis was another in a long succession of rather meaningless (and somewhat fluffy) piano commentaries:
David Yeagley — "Franz Liszt's 'Dante Sonata': The Origins, the Criticism, a Selective Musical Analysis, and Commentary" (1994)

His equally fluffy knowledge of American Indian people is also limited to what he imagines as he reads stereotyped magazines, inaccurate history publications, and Wikipedia entries. He contends that Indians were not civilized, and whites gave to Indians the 'ability to negotiate.' However, Indians have always been the greatest of negotiators, treating others, including non-humans and the earth, as "people." Bird people, Water people, many kinds of non-human people are what makes up the collective world of the superior negotiating skills of Indian people. Knowing how to relate, and how to 'be related' is one of the better-known strengths of Indian people — mitakuye oyasin!

So what do we make of Yeagley's nonsense?
David Yeagley — "Social skills are a thing of civilization. Trying to get along with others is a western European custom. Plains Indians never had need for such talk. Negotiation generally meant weakness" (Mar. 2007)

Well, for those who still refuse to recognize Yeagley's idiocy, and still get whipped up into some Patriotamentia Attack over Yeagley's phony warrior facade, check those aggressive hormones at the door, engage your brain instead, and understand that American Indians were the greatest of negotiators — including the Comanches — despite Yeagley's personal degradation of the great Comanche people. Yeagley wouldn't know a Comanche if he looked in the mirror.

The 'warlike' nature of Native American peoples was often fabricated to add legitimacy to European aims of conquest (Kroeber 1961); the foraging Comanche maintained their non-violent ways for centuries before the European invasion, becoming violent only upon contact with marauding civilisation.

Yeagley is a paid fabricator, including his own rather "creative" lineage, and continually embarrasses actual Comanches with his stupidity: Trust anything he pontificates about at your own risk. You've been warned.

March 27, 2007

Waffling Wikipedia Warrior

David A. Yeagley
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Yeagley is a white supremacist who poses as a Comanche Indian. He was mistakenly enrolled in the Comanche Nation because the stepmother who adopted him is Comanche. He falsely claims descent from the Comanche leader, Bad Eagle). Comanche elders and members of the tribal government all deny he is actually Comanche. In 2006 Yeagley, his employer David Horowitz, and Front Page magazine used legal threats to try to silence Kiowa activist Cinda Hughes and the Native American Times for revealing his impersonation. Both refused to back down. Hughes stands by her research. The Native American Times issued a statement pointedly refusing to call Yeagley a Comanche, only admitting he was enrolled. Yeagley's enrollment was never the issue, only its validity.

Yeagley was educated at Oberlin, Yale, Emory, Harvard, and the University of Arizona. Famed Cheyenne activist Suzan Harjo referred to him as "a lifer of a student" in her widely read article on him, "A Small and Unworthy Man." His title of doctor is deceptive since he claims expertise in politics, history, and Native cultures. His degree is in music, earning him the nickname among his critics of "the piano doctor." (The other widely used nickname for him is "Michael Jackson" for his effeminate appearance and rumors of having had plastic surgery to "look more Indian.")

Dr. Yeagley taught a single course in humanities for a single semester at the University of Oklahoma. He stirred up controversy by trying to indoctrinate his students with his far right views. Contrary to his false claim that he was fired for being conservative (he is actually a white supemacist), Yeagley was actually let go for repeatedly falsely claiming to speak for the the university. By his own account, his supervisors actually tried to prevent his firing.

An admirer of the brutal dictatorship of the late Shah of Iran, he has published many articles in Persian Heritage Magazine, is on the editorial board of the magazine, and wrote an "epic poem" in honor of the late dictator. In nearly three decades in universities, he has only published a single article, in the Journal of the American Liszt Society. Yeagley is a paid blogger for the Far Right, working for fellow reactionary David Horowitz's FrontPageMagazine.com. He appeared once on Bill O'Reilly. He is widely criticized by not just actual American Indians, but actual conservatives.

Yeagley is a music composer, as well as a performing artist. He falsely claims to be the first American Indian classical composer to release an album of original compositions and the first Indian to write classical music for the American Indian flute. Both have already been accomplished by other Native composers as far back as the 1930s. After criticizing the National Museum of the American Indian as "Communist" and "anti white" Yeagley performed there in 2006 after having friends of his get him on the NMAI musical program, over the objections of actual Native composers.

Though calling himself a conservative, few actual conservatives would agree with that designation. He is a white supremacist who uses American Indian causes and imagery to advance his belief in the superiority of whites over all other races. His forum, Badeagle.com is overwhelmingly made up of whites, including a variety of white supremacists, eugenicists, Neo-Nazis, and other racists (including a small number of self-hating Natives and Blacks.) His own words leave little doubt as to what his beliefs are:

"Superior beauty is in the white race...In the darker races, everything is always the same, dark brown and black a beastly bore."

"These days the white woman is expected to humble herself before the darkie."

"Judeo-Christian religion allowed the European Caucasian race to advance above all other people.The darker races now encroach through integration and intermarriage."

"Maybe Hitler was partially right on 'the hated white race' thing."

"There is a reason for differences. This is to keep the human race separated into smaller groups. Love of race is the only 'saving grace' left in the world."

"Indian men...deserve to be on the bottom of the barrel. They cannot appreciate good will, they are possessed by envy, and have no higher thought than lies."

Note: Someone has edited this Wikipedia entry since it was first posted.

March 26, 2007

To Respect a Fake Comanche Liar

From the Bad Eagle "mad libs in the looking glass" series
(the series that replaces David Yeagley's tangled thoughts
with his own mirror reflection to untangle the real truth):


Unlike BadEagle.org, "some Bad Eagles are maybe just a little more dramatic in their demands, since they feel particularly neglected. It’s a relative thing, emotional expression. They’re not thinking about society. They’re thinking about themselves.


I once encountered this kind of demanding Bad Eagle in the person of dubious heritage. Years ago a troubled and troublous Bad Eagle set up shop on the web, and made everyone miserable for several years.

His vulgar vehemence, physical threats and assaults led me on more than one occasion to the blogger police (I and other bloggers). At one point, I spoke to a semi-retired Republican pundit who was Instant Messaging, when I filed a TOS report. He said some interesting things to say.

You’re a single man, right? he asked.

Yes, but what does that have to do with anything? I somewhat protested.

Man, just give him some attention! Just say, Hey, dude! You’re lookin’ good today!

I testified that I never spoke to him. It was degrading to be around him. He disgraced the worldwide web. I avoided him.

“But that’s my point, the Republican said. You just need to give him a little attention!

Not my style. This Bad Eagle was overtly fascinated with Comanche Rudy Youngblood, a genuine Warrior and a true Patriot officially endorsed by the Comanche Tribal Chairman, Wallace Coffey. But this Bad Eagle was not honorable to me. The man was loud, obnoxious, and arrogant. He tried to control the web, and was utterly repugnant to everyone, especially other Comanches.

But, that old Republican pundit was right. That man just wanted attention.

And yet, he was wrong. He wanted me to lower myself to his level, to adapt his standards of behavior — which I considered immoral. He wanted me to allow myself to be ruled by an angry fake Indian. He wanted me to indulge him.

But I say to respect a fake Comanche liar means to hold him to higher standards. Lift him up. He’ll appreciate it in the end. He has to. Otherwise, is he worth respecting? He’ll remain miserable, with no hope for anything better”

March 23, 2007

The magically white David Yeagley

from the Bad Eagle Journal

How is it Yeagley can pose as an Indian when he’s really a white supremacist? It’s not sanity in operation, so if it isn’t magic, it must be punditry. One thing is for sure, it’s another word game. After all the “darkie” admonitions, the rants about the NMAI museum including “darkies” within it, and all the rants about the "low morality" of black women, Yeagley has no political or moral right to say anything at all about anyone.

How is it that Yeagley “believes” he can determine what is appropriate terminology and what isn’t? He is the worst possible judge of such things, having himself a malignant conscience when it comes to letting blacks, muslims, American Indians, or women decide FOR THEMSELVES what they wish to be called. No, Yeagley “the great white pontificator” has decreed that he can — and will — decide what is appropriate for everyone else. He is the self-proclaimed language police. Talk about PC idiocy.

It’s a good thing Yeagley’s “humor” is so poorly developed, assuring that he remains rather oblivious to most folks, which is a good thing. Speaking against Indians, putting others down, denigrating women, and word games ... this is apparently what occupies Yeagley’s thoughts, endlessly. It’s good that we have mostly better things to do, than play “Simon Says.”

David Yeagley — “For what it's worth, I do protest the comical use of the word Negro, only for the reason that it robs me of the one word I thought carried respect. Of course, lampooning is what American politics is all about. I will still use the word Negro with respect, but now I'll probably always have to stifle a laugh that comes with it, now that it's been used in sport, rather hilariously. Rats. Humor is so powerful! Wholly hilarity, Black Man!” (DY, Mar.22, 2007)
Bad Eagle Says ... “darkies infest the American Indian museum”
Bad Eagle Says ... “women are whores”
Bad Eagle Says ... “Indians are weak old women”
Bad Eagle Says ... “I’m important and if you don’t believe that, just ask me”

We have better things to do than play Bad Eagle Says.

March 20, 2007

David Yeagley: the non-Indian

from the Bad Eagle Journal

These words (below) are absolutely funny, both in a laughable sense and as an oddity. To have the living, breathing Indian Apple declaring he knows how Indians of today think, or how Indians of the past thought, is way beyond his reach, far outside his realm.

Yeagley is not an Indian. He’s a white supremacist and a Christian dominionist, who uncritically skews his activities toward anything that holds whites in absolute power. David Yeagley is non-Indian on the inside, even if he was adopted by a Comanche woman on the outside.

David Yeagley — “Indians reacted to the new people with an instinctive sense of equality ... But for Indians to cry “Hey, you didn’t live up to your own standards!” is ironic and irrational. If I am an Indian, what do I care whether the white man is a hypocrite or not? To condemn him for doing wrong, by his standards, is being like him, and not being Indian. What difference do his standards make to me—unless I fully accept them for myself, and be like him?” (DY, Mar.20, 2007)
First, Yeagley knows nothing of Indian thinking, so proselytizing about what we think, or don’t think, is not something Yeagley can do. He can make up a myth about the Bad Eagle lineage, falsify and misrepresent birth records, paint himself a "great" hero, sure. But it does not change the truth: Yeagley cannot think Indian.

Second, if non-Indians have the ability to destroy the planet, including us, then we’d be totally stupid NOT to condemn the lies and deceit; justice is part of being Indian. Ignoring those who are destroying the earth, and killing us right along with her, need to get their heads out of the sand. Yeagley too, largely because he is one of the offenders himself, consistently arguing against the rights of Indian people. Just read his irrational blog and you’ll quickly see for yourself: the boy is fruit loops.
David Yeagley — “The price of condemning him is thinking like him ... I say, Indians leaders who condemn America are white. They first need to express their objection to America in an Indian way, otherwise they are unconvincing. To speak the white man’s moral language is the deepest evidence of defeat” (DY, Mar.20, 2007)
Woe Yeagley, where’d you pull out that piece of fantasy: Indian leaders are condemning America? That’s crazy thinking, dude. You’re the one ignoring the Constitution, with your lame defense of traitor Gonzales, by supporting the Bush crime family despite the evidence, and by advocating for a neo-Stalin America complete with the new Christian fascists at the helm. Indian leaders protect and preserve America, unlike you.

When any new administration enters the white house, after the opposing party has had it for one or two administrations, there is always a clearing out of justice appointees. It is common practice, and no one utters a wary nary word of protest, no hari-karis, no bloody marys, no sour cherries, not even a single hairy fairy.

However, what is NOT common, is firing all of your OWN administration’s appointees, mid-term, and trying to appoint new ones without congressional oversight or approval: exactly what Gonzales was trying to do. If the executive branch tries bypassing congress it is usurping invented unitary powers which are in point of fact unconstitutional. Leahy is correct, and Gonzales is the traitor by ignoring the constitution’s separation of powers and system of checks and balances.

Again Yeagley, you don’t even understand what the Constitution does, and you call yourself a “patriot”?

David Yeagley — “Senator Patrick Leahy et al. are hysterical about the White House dismissal of eight attorney generals across the country--despite the fact that it is an absolutely legal, executive, presidential power exercised by President Bush. Never mind the fact that Bill Clinton fired all attorney generals in 1993 (through Janet Reno, then Attorney General of the United States), and that nary a word of protest was spoken. Hillary Clinton is now demanding Attorney General Alberto Gonzales resign. This is the apogee of hypocrisy and amorality... According to the United States Constitution, the Senate has absolutely no business interfereing [sic!] with this Executive power (Article II, Section 2.) What Democrat Senator Leahy et al. are doing is wholly unconstitutional, and actually illegal. Senator Leahy and his cohorts should be prosecuted!” (DY, Mar.20, 2007)
You are biggest fool among fools, “mister” Yeagley. You cannot win composer competitions, cannot be awarded grants (though I hear through the grapevine that you try), cannot invent new theories of harmony (and you obviously don’t try), and you are the supreme clown of the American Indian patron saint of Indian Apples. That is why this Bad Eagle site is here to stay, to point out the difference between a genuine American Indian warrior like Winona LaDuke and a half-witted make-believe stereotype like yourself. BadEagle.org has the goods on David Adolf Yeagley.

March 18, 2007

Yeagley Yahoo Challenge

Create the funniest caption for the "great white pontificator" in this photo (complete with the Tandy Leather "Trading Post" head band)!

Health to Illegal Immigrants?

from the Bad Eagle Journal

The piano doctor is at it again, calling for masses of people to suffer extinction rather than bow to his white supremacist fantasies. This time he is claiming that his fantastical visions are inevitable history as if with divinity at his command he can see into the past as well as into the future. In other words, Yeagley’s theory is a load of horse manure.

Consider this simple and elegant definition of history, as a possible starting point: History is “either the study of the past, or the product of our attempts to understand the past.” This says nothing of the divine right of kings, nor of the divine right of some city-upon-a-hill notion, nor of the inevitability of any nation to exist or cease to exist. All such nations are the products of many factors and variables, none of which indicate ‘natural’ providence. History does not have “final solutions” as Hitler did, history is an ongoing process of questions, interpretations, defining and redefining. It has no ‘inevitable purposes’ like theology might, nor pragmatic theories of some “master race” like David Yeagley asserts.

So what do we make of statements comparing immigrants to traitors, such as this ... ?

David Yeagley — Who would say such a thing as "Death to Illegal Immigrants"? What might that actually mean? What would occasion the thought? Death to traitors? Who'd a thunk it? Everyone's 'thunk' it, and has been thinking it for thousands of years. It's called history” (DY, Mar.18, 2007).
And statements advocating a “creator’s” preference of one nation over another, such as this ... ?
David Yeagley — “True nationhood is not created, but ordained of nature and of nature's Creator. Therefore, the invasion of Mexico into the United States is criminal by every description... This is indeed a war of nationhood, and they are proven in sympathy with the enemy” (DY, Mar.18, 2007)
And finally, statements advocating war as the best and brightest of solutions according to the providence of history, such as this ... ?
David Yeagley — “The enemy must be destroyed, one way or another. His aggressions must be made to cease... Violence is a great ego boost for the morally abandoned peoples of the world. Unfortunately, in this kind of world, it has to be dealt with--by supreme violence. That is the lesson of history” (DY, Mar.18, 2007).
First, immigrants are not traitors illegal or otherwise, they are simply searching for a place to reside and have minimal legal status at best, according to the country they occupy; so no, they cannot be mischaracterized as traitors. They have human rights, and civil rights and are most likely nice decent folks. So Yeagley’s comparison is skewed and smacks of sensationalism.

Second, true nations ARE created, contrary to Yeagley’s utopian fantasies. Nations are not ordained from any other source than themselves, and they are 100% human endeavors. People create nations; nature creates nature. So Yeagley’s divine-right-of-nations call is simplistic hyperbole. If Yeagley thinks immigrants are traitors, this opinion has nothing whatsoever to do with divinity nor nature, it is simply a notion harbored by David Adolf Yeagley and nothing more. He is a bigot not because of history nor because of nature; bigots are the creators of their own bigotry. Yeagley is racist because he wants to be racist — history and nature have nothing to do with it.

Third, war is never the answer; even in war there is eventually negotiation. Negotiation, cooperation, consensus building efforts, these are the processes of peace. War is created by warmongers, those who wish force and violence upon others, always using the argument that wars can only be dealt with by more wars. It is a deadly and rather stupid process, war-making. Yeagley’s arguments here are simply one side of the warmongering elite’s fantasies, who continue warring because others are warring too. The process is stupidly circular, a never-ending reactionary myth of fending off the “other guy’s war” with, ironically, your own war. Yeagley’s phony “warrior” mask is infantile and certainly not drawn at all from American Indian life. Yeagley is a fake patriot who spouts phony rhetoric, and the two-faced, cherry-picked logic of his simplistic arguments boggle the mind. He may be a doctor of piano, but certainly not of reason nor logic.

In my own view, I wish these so-called “illegal immigrants” the best health and happiness America can provide, and I believe America has an obligation to treat them as welcomed with dignity.

March 17, 2007

The Substance of Evil

from the Bad Eagle Journal

David Adolf Yeagley is more guilty than white people.

March 15, 2007

Yeagley takes lying seriously, for the “right" people

from the Bad Eagle Journal

Remember these words?

David Yeagley — "I take lying seriously. I hate liars. Indeed. I hate liars. I hate being lied about" (DY Oct 2006)
But no sooner did one of Yeagley’s main supporters, John Martin, get caught fabricating his identity that Yeagley did ... absolutely nothing. That’s right, nothing at all. It’s not first time the piano doctor has been caught — himself — with two faces.

Remember his claim to being the first Indian to write an opera, revealed to be a fabrication because Zitkala-Sa was the first some 70 years before Yeagley was even born?

Remember his claim of writing a new and previously undiscovered theory of harmonic development, revealed not only as a false claim but as a near impossibility given the advanced state of mathematics?

Remember his claim to be the first Indian to compose classical music for the Indian wood flute, which of course was proven false as Quapaw/Cherokee composer Dr. Louis Ballard premiered an American Indian flute concerto with the Phoenix Symphony Orchestra back in 1961?


Remember his claim of creating the only “epic poem” of the 20th Century, precluding all the genuine epic poems by the 20th-century’s better established writers?

Fabrication after fabrication; can we really take anything Yeagley claims as “serious” seriously? Only the foolish of fools would do so, after looking at the abundance of available evidence. Yeagley himself has been caught in many lies, so we must ask (considering the above quotation): does he “hate” himself?

Remember this bold claim by John Martin, aka Tallsoldier77?
John Martin — “I am enrolled in the Oglala, Sioux Rez from Pine Ridge .S.D... I graduated high school in 1986 and joined the Army (DD214 available upon request, lol.) I served 4 years in the Army I attended basic, AIT and Jump school at FT. Benning, GA. After basic I was shipped to Germany where I spent 2 years, then I did my last 18 months at FT. Bragg, N.C. I was a member of the 82nd Airborne Division. I got recalled to do a year when my unit paricipated [sic!] in Operation Desert Storm. I ETS'd (seperated) [sic!] with honors from the Army in 91'.” (tallsoldier77, Oct 2006)
Of course, as with much of Yeagley’s site, he was uncovered as a fraud, though his spelling is comparable to Yeagley’s I must admit. But Yeagley himself did nothing and still does nothing — the twin faces of the piano doctor — it’s apparently not okay to lie unless you’re the “right sort of person” or belong to the “right people.” Again, John martin is a fake, and has many identities on the web, many in dating sites, which I’m guessing he is trying to keep hidden from his wife.

Another fabrication: tallsoldier77 claims to have been at Ft. Benning, GA. However, the patch that he flies on his blogger signature is an Airborne patch of Army Special Operations Command out of Fort Bragg, NC. If Martin was at Fort Bragg, he was certainly not in the Airborne, have a look for yourself — from USMILREC — There is nothing about John W. Martin in the 82nd Airborne:
Name : JOHN WESLEY MARTIN
Service : ARMY

Service Component : REGULAR

Pay Grade : E-4

Military Specialty : 76Y1O (unit supply and armorer)

Home of Record : Unknown


Name : JOHN WHITLO MARTIN

Service : ARMY

Service Component : REGULAR

Pay Grade : E-2

Military Specialty : 11B1O (infantryman)

Home of Record : Unknown


Name : JOHN WILLIAM MARTIN
Service : ARMY Service
Component : REGULAR
Pay Grade : E-1
Military Specialty : 13B1O (cannon crewmember)

Home of Record : Unknown


Name : JOHN WILBUR MARTIN

Service : ARMY
Service Component : REGULAR
Pay Grade : E-1
Military Specialty : 62E0O (Heavy Construction Equipment Operator)
Home of Record : Unknown

March 14, 2007

David Adolf Yeagley?

from the Bad Eagle Journal

Did you ever notice how the life of Hitler and Yeagley seem somehow parallel? All the ranting about "superior" races and "master" races? All the reductionism to “blood” percentages and “warrior” stereotypes? Amazingly similar, if I do say so.

That’s probably why he loves and defends Hitler so much, yes? I’m sure you can find other similarities for yourselves, but these brief similarities below do seem rather startling. Check this out:


About Mothers:

Adolf Hitler — “Young Adolf was showered with love and affection by his mother” (world healers blog)

David Yeagley — “Who among us has not felt the divine joy in our mother's love? ...Whom can we always turn to for love and acceptance, no matter what? Who is always there, to mend, to encourage, to forgive, to buoy up our spirit? ... I speak as a son, with a mother who... never failed to love” (DY, May 2006)

About Fathers:
Adolf Hitler — “there is anecdotal evidence that Adolf's father regularly beat him during his childhood” (world healers blog)

David Yeagley — “I refuse to feel intimidated... or otherwise limited by being Comanche. My white father apologized to me for my being Indian ... I've been told that wherein I have failed, it is because I am Indian” (DY, Dec 2006)

About Non-Whites:
Adolf Hitler — "[The Jews'] ultimate goal is the denaturalization, the promiscuous bastardization of other peoples, the lowering of the racial level of the highest peoples as well as the domination of his racial mishmash through the extirpation of the folkish intelligentsia and its replacement by the members of his own people," he wrote [Mein Kampf]. On the contrary, the German people were of the highest racial purity and those destined to be the master race according to Hitler. To maintain that purity, it was necessary to avoid intermarriage with subhuman races such as Jews and Slavs” (world healers blog)

David Yeagley — “It's all psychological. White is right, black is dark, suspicious, and evil” (DY, Jun 2003)

David Yeagley — “I say, love of race ... is the only saving grace of the world. Without it ... the world will simply become an emasculated, mass wimp... There is a reason for differences. This is to keep the human race separated into smaller groups. Love of race is the only 'saving grace' left in the world... Mixed raced people can't help what they are... But there is no need to repeat the same, or to advocate more, or to idolize such a condition by perpetuating it. When you realize you're on a wrong path,... the only dignified thing to do is to get back on the right path” (DY, May 2005)

Bad Eagle.com SUSPENDED

From the Bad Eagle Blog

Did someone not receive their check from Mark Winters?
From David WhoreO'twits?
Or did David Adolf Yeagley do something particularly vile?
Or was his site hacked ... as I'm guessing he will claim soon enough.
Of course, "commies" and "darkies" were responsible.
Well, whatever the reason, isn't it nice to have a cleaner, more friendly, internet today?
Somehow, it just feels better doesn't it? We think so.


"This Domain (badeagle.com) Has Been Disabled
For information on restoring your account please call customer service as soon as possible

When/If you call our support help line, please have your site name ready"

March 13, 2007

Duffer A. Yeagley: Misdirection Pundit

From the Bad Eagle Blog

I must say that so much misdirection and fabrication comes trickling off Duffer A. Yeagley’s web site, it’s sometimes difficult to make time to address it before another stream of Duffer misdirection starts flowing. But, I think I might as well adopt Bad Eagle as my own moniker too. I mean, why not? Yeagley does, and he wants Indian mascots to be proliferated rather than removed, so I’ll adopt Bad Eagle perhaps, and write articles under my new mascot ... perhaps.

David Yeagley — “United States Marine Corps General Peter Pace, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, recently pronounced homosexuality as immoral. I suppose that's what it takes these days, a Marine, to tell it like it is, or at least like he thinks it is.... In any case, reading into the depths of the article, we discover that the timing of this new homosexual surge matches perfectly with the Democrat call to remove troops from the Middle East” (Mar.13, 2007)
First, the rally cry against gays is infantile, Pace declared homosexuality was "adultery" and therefore immoral. Adultery? When Gays cannot legally marry, how can there be adultery? The logic of this reasoning is staggeringly stupid. Of course it comes from a stodgy few who think the world should be flat, and if God in Heaven wanted it round he would have made it that way.

Gay people are not an accident of evolution. They are not evil. They are some of the society’s best artists, musicians, painters, dancers, singers. They are here to stay, no matter what old farts complain about. All the complaining in the universe will not change that fact. This voice crying out against the Gays is a fading voice, it is the last cries of the last holdouts, the flat-earthers. Treat Duffers with a bit of sympathy here, for whatever sad reason, he simply cannot join us in the grownup's world. So I hereby decree, as the new Bad Eagle, that I am 100% supportive of the new legislation being introduced by Rep. Martin Meehan, D-Mass to reverse the military's ban on Gays to serve openly.


Second, it is very interesting that Duffers takes what is clearly a Republican talking point and tries to slam the Democratic people with it. This is not timed with removing troops, which many Republicans are supporting. No, it is timed again with the rampant corruption of Republicans. When dirty laundry gets aired, the Republicans try to misdirect one’s attention from it. So, don’t see the wizard behind the curtain! Forget you saw Republican-fed cockroaches and Republican-grown black mold in the veteran hospitals! Forget that the Republicans “outsourced” the military hospitals to a private company without oversight! And, forget that Bush’s Republican war is a dismal failure and at such a great cost for Americans! Forget, forget, go to sleep, forget ... the Republican dream.

But here is the real reason Duffers and the other anti-thinkers are attempting to misdirect, because the Republican President is sending injured troops back into Iraq, after treating them in blighted hospitals. Bush is sending INJURED TROOPS to die in Iraq. If you really want to know why the media is focused on the flat-earther Pace, read this article by Mark Benjamin:
The Army is ordering injured troops to go to Iraq. At Fort Benning, soldiers who were classified as medically unfit to fight are now being sent to war. Is this an isolated incident or a trend?

March 11, 2007 | COLUMBUS, Ga. — "This is not right," said Master Sgt. Ronald Jenkins, who has been ordered to Iraq even though he has a spine problem that doctors say would be damaged further by heavy Army protective gear. "This whole thing is about taking care of soldiers," he said angrily. "If you are fit to fight you are fit to fight. If you are not fit to fight, then you are not fit to fight."

As the military scrambles to pour more soldiers into Iraq, a unit of the Army's 3rd Infantry Division at Fort Benning, Ga., is deploying troops with serious injuries and other medical problems, including GIs who doctors have said are medically unfit for battle. Some are too injured to wear their body armor, according to medical records.

On Feb. 15, Master Sgt. Jenkins and 74 other soldiers with medical conditions from the 3rd Division's 3rd Brigade were summoned to a meeting with the division surgeon and brigade surgeon. These are the men responsible for handling each soldier's "physical profile," an Army document that lists for commanders an injured soldier's physical limitations because of medical problems -- from being unable to fire a weapon to the inability to move and dive in three-to-five-second increments to avoid enemy fire. Jenkins and other soldiers claim that the division and brigade surgeons summarily downgraded soldiers' profiles, without even a medical exam, in order to deploy them to Iraq. It is a claim division officials deny....
Read More Here.

March 11, 2007

Bad Eagle’s “I have a dream”

from the Psychotic Fantasy Collection

Now is the time to make real the promises of Dominion. Now is the time to rise from the desolate valley of the darkies to the sunlit path of white purity. Now is the time to lift our nation from the quicksands of minority whiners to the solid rock of warriorhood. Now is the time to make the Great White Throne a reality for all of God's children.

It would be fatal for the nation to overlook the urgency of the moment. This sweltering summer of American Indian's whining discontent will not pass until there is a supremacy of the mighty White Throne. Two-Thousand and Seven is not an end, but a beginning. And those who hope that the Whites needed to blow off steam and will now be content will have a rude awakening if the nation returns to business as usual. And there will be neither rest nor tranquility in America until the White Man is granted his supremacy rights.

But there is something that I must say to my people, who stand on the warm threshold which leads into the Great White Throne: In the process of gaining our rightful place, we must not be guilty of weakness and womanhood. Let us not seek to satisfy our thirst for domination by drinking from the cup of feminism and liberalism. We must forever conduct our struggle on the high plane of loftiness and dominion. We must not allow our women to rise with us. Again and again, we must rise to the majestic heights of the sacred fatherland.

The marvelous new militancy which has engulfed the middle east must not lead us to a distrust other white warriors, for many of our white brothers have come to realize that their destiny is tied up with our destiny.

We are all warriors.

And as we war, we must make the pledge that we shall always war.

We cannot turn back.

Let us not wallow in the valley of darkies, I say to you today, my fellow warriors.

And so even though we face the difficulties of today and tomorrow, I still have a dream. It is a dream deeply rooted in the American dream.

I have a dream that one day this white nation will rise up and live out the true meaning of its creed: “The white male built the country."

I have a dream that one day on the white halls of the Throne, the sons of white warriors will be served by the women they own as master and slave at the table of the Great White Throne.

I have a dream that one day even the state of twisted liberal language, a state rank with shifting understandings and changing meanings will be transformed into an oasis of codification and stability.

I have a dream that ten little Indians will one day bow down and give homage to the Great White Throne where they will not whine about the color of their dark skin but be content with the character of their superiors.

I have a dream today!

I have a dream that one day, all women, with their vicious evils, with their lips dripping with the lies of "feminism" and "equality" — one day little black girls will be able to serve little white boy masters, and white girls serve the wishes of their white masters.

I have a dream today!

And this will be the day — this will be the day when all of God's darkies will be able to sing with new meaning:

My country 'tis all white, sweet crosses we ignite, of whites I sing.
Land that my fathers made, land where white Pilgrim's prayed,
From every mountainside, white men are king!

And if America is to be a great nation, this must become true.
And so let white men reign from the prodigious hilltops of New Hampshire.
Let white men reign from the mighty mountains of New York.
Let white men reign from the heightening Alleghenies of Pennsylvania.
Let white men reign from the snow-capped Rockies of Colorado.
Let white men reign from the curvaceous slopes of California.

But not only that:
Let white men reign from Stone Mountain of Georgia.
Let white men reign from Lookout Mountain of Tennessee.
Let white men reign from every hill and molehill of Mississippi.
From every mountainside, white men reign.

And when this happens, when we allow the white men to reign, when we place the Great White Throne on every village and every hamlet, from every state and every city, we will be able to speed up that day when all of God's children, darkies and women, Jews and Muslims, American Indians and Liberals, will be able to worship and sing praises to the white master race:
Agree at last! Agree at last!
Thank the Throne, we agree at last!

— Bad Eagle

March 10, 2007

Psychotic Supremicist: Is Yeagley losing it?

I'm "Wacko Jacko" and “a man,”
By sucking up the Klu Klux Klan.
My site delights the great white knights,
all right? — Bad Eagle
Is David Yeagley losing it? He has gone from calling Christians toilets to calling nonwhite Christians turds. His words reveal the thoughts behind them, and why Yeagley would smear good Christians like skid marks on his pasty white undies, is beyond reasonable. I think we could safely characterize Yeagley's recent 'white' hissy-fits as rather psychotic. They are immaturely constructed, of course, because America is not white and never was, it has always been a cosmopolitan adventure.
Yeagley — “The white male built the country" (DY, Mar.9, 07).
Fact — America has always been religiously and culturally diverse.
Yeagley — “For the liberal, Communist "you owe me" crowd to think they have any right to that throne is absolutely delusional" (DY, Mar.9, 07).
Fact — For a white minority to aspire to possess all power is delusional.
Yeagley — “The White West drew the boundaries (quite unwisely perhaps), and drilled the oil wells. That these ungrateful nomads should think to bite the hand that fed it only shows their immaturity" (DY, Mar.9, 07).
Fact — The UK and USA have no business attacking or occupying the Middle East, and those oil resources belong to the Middle East, not to the UK nor to the USA. The UK and USA — in reality — have no say-so into the affairs of other countries whatsoever, despite their repeated violations to the contrary.
Yeagley — “The leftists jesters have done there best to bring the 'Turd World' into America, and to make America part of the big brown movement ... the brown movement will indeed be flushed down the toilet" (DY, Mar.9, 07).
Fact — Nonwhite people are in no way inferior to whites, and certainly not turds. Nonwhites are actually the world’s majority and mostly responsible for all the activity of the world, rather than the white minority.
Yeagley — “I'm just exacerbated that people can be so blind" (DY, Mar.9, 07).
Fact — Most Comanches, including Tribal Chair Wallace Coffey, do not agree with Yeagley on nearly every issue. Most Comanches regard Yeagley as the blind one.
Yeagley — “Think of it this way: the whites build the throne. They are obviously superior... If you can't build your own thrown, then in all sincerety [sic!], shut up!" (DY, Mar.9, 07).
Fact — Yeagley’s logic is flawed: Were Yeagley’s above claim true, and were he an American Indian himself, his own white power proclamations would fall under the inferior category. By his own advice, his own web site is inferior and should be wholly disregarded (i.e., he should “shut up,” etc.). But the above statement is false, and he could never be characterized as an Indian. Plus “sincerity” is spelled with two “i”s and only one "e" ... or was he using the 'intellectual' spelling (with two "e"s and only one "i")?

Moreover, for Yeagley to harp back to the imaginary 'good-ole-days' when America was lily white, is not only erroneous history, but constructed by an immature thought process. Writing the classic 'smear brown people' article, with the seeming intent to lift up white people, is nothing more than an infantile and insecurity-driven 'oneupsmanship' (tearing another down to lift oneself up).

AREA FOR FURTHER RESEARCH

Yeagley Psychosis?
Psychotic disorders include severe mental disorders which are characterized by extreme impairment of a person's ability to think clearly, respond emotionally, communicate effectively, understand reality, and behave appropriately. Psychotic symptoms can be seen in teenagers with a number of serious mental illnesses, such as depression, bi-polar disorder (manic-depression), schizophrenia, and with some forms of alcohol and drug abuse. Psychotic symptoms interfere with a person’s daily functioning and can be quite debilitating. Psychotic symptoms include delusions and hallucinations.

Delusion: A false, fixed, odd, or unusual belief firmly held by the patient. The belief is not ordinarily accepted by other members of the person’s culture or subculture. There are delusions of paranoia (others are plotting against them), grandiose delusions (exaggerated ideas of one's importance or identity), and somatic delusions (a healthy person believing that he/she has a terminal illness).

Hallucination: A sensory perception (seeing, hearing, feeling, and smelling) in the absence of an outside stimulus. For example, with auditory hallucinations, the person hears voices when there is no one talking.

March 7, 2007

Yeagley proclaims ‘Christians’ are ‘toilets’

from the Bad Eagle Journal

First, Waffles starts by proclaiming the world is “white” and “Christian” which is kin to proclaiming it flat. Second, he declares a secure world. But the world is far from secure, and Cheney, along with the Bush crime family is a large reason for the insecurity. But what we find most telling from Idiot Eagle is his positive comparison of the so-called Aryan greatness by denoting a toilet. Yes, you read this right, to Mr. Civil Whites, the Christian population of the world is a commode:

David Yeagley — “Who rules the world? ... White men... Christian men... European white. Judeo-Christian, "Bible" white. This throne, in this world, will not change. It is secure. White man will not be de-throned. The position is permanent... it's still the Great White Throne” (DY, Mar. 7, 2007)

The piano doctor continues by declaring all the hatred and mistrust in the government is the result of American Indians. Yes, again you read this correctly, American Indians are the cause célèbre for governmental mistrust, hatred and probably responsible for the rampant Republican cronyism too, I’m sure. Know what I think? I think your piano is waaaaaay outta tune with reality, Mr. Fakeriot Act.
David Yeagley — “But I propose the idea of guilt... American Indian guilt... American Indians are responsible for whatever misanthropy exists in the United States government... The throne is white. The whites built it, and anyone who tries to deceive the races into thinking that throne belongs to all people is a psychological criminal, a moral thief, and an ideological terrorist” (DY, Mar. 7, 2007)

Essentially, you are calling anyone who disagrees with your little 'whiteness' hissy-fit, an immoral terrorist? Who is it that is throwing the hissy-fit Tepee Tom? Not us, the real Indians. Who’s the one spewing forth his little 'political correctness' campaign about white power? Why, it’s Mr. Spleen Jeans himself, David Yeagley. The great Bumbanshee Warrior rides again, righting America’s wrongs as only he can. Well "all-whitey-then," I guess the rest of the (mostly non-white) world will just have to bow down and "Sieg Heil!" It’s probably a good thing that Christians are toilets, so we have somewhere to blow chucks after getting a rhetorical eyeful of Mr. Full Loon Rising. Well, what ever could we expect from David Yeagley after all; his thoughts come from the white dominionist latrine anyway. They are simply seeping onto his web pages again — so let's all spew and salute — "Sieg Heil!"

A True Oklahoma Warrior (Not Yeagley)

from the Bad Eagle Journal

Do you regard David Yeagley as an Oklahoma warrior? Not if you’re smart, of course. Yeagley never served, and never would serve. The poster child Chicken Hawk has appropriated an “Indian name” as his web page moniker and pumped out immaturely constructed “reports” like third grade essays. Yeagley does not check his facts, and does not reason beyond the most shallow of legalistic lines of thinking (i.e., he cannot see past the end of his own nose, etc.). As I have consistently suggested, forget Yeagley.

A true Oklahoma Warrior is Joshua Key, who actually enlisted (unlike Yeagley), went to Iraq (unlike Yeagley), and has realized the truth (unlike Yeagley). Yes, Yeagley is an Oklahoman, unfortunately for Oklahoma, but that is where this comparison ends. Key is a true warrior, brave enough to stand on sound principles, defend the constitution and country, and behave as a decent human being. Read on:

“Joshua Key, 28, was a poor, uneducated Oklahoma country boy who saw the U.S. army and its promised benefits -- from free health care to career training -- as the ticket to a better life. In 2002, not yet 24 but already married and the father of two, Key enlisted... a year later he was in Iraq:

Something was amiss... We never found weapons or indications of terrorism. I never found a thing that seemed to justify the terror we inflicted every time we blasted through the door of a civilian home, broke everything in sight, punched and zipcuffed the men, and sent them away... Then something happened that haunts my dreams to this day.

All the women were led back inside the house and our entire platoon was ordered to stand guard outside it. Four U.S. military men entered the house with the women. They closed the doors... our platoon was made to stand guard outside that house for about an hour. The women started shouting and screaming. The men stayed in there with them, behind closed doors. It went on and on and on...

It struck me then that we, the American soldiers, were the terrorists. We were terrorizing Iraqis. Intimidating them. Beating them. Destroying their homes. Probably raping them. The ones we didn't kill had all the reasons in the world to become terrorists themselves. Given what we were doing to them, who could blame them for wanting to kill us, and all Americans? A sick realization lodged like a cancer in my gut. It grew and festered, and troubled me more with every passing day. We, the Americans, had become the terrorists in Iraq” [
Joshua Key].

Read the rest of the report here.

March 6, 2007

New Bad Eagle "Mascot" Logo

from the Bad Eagle Journal

The piano doctor LOVES American indian mascots, and he continually goes against the wishes of genuine Indians by supporting the continued use of these repulsive images. From his armchair, the great white pontificator argues that offensive mascots actually “honor” Indian people:

David Yeagley — “No, don't dare remove Indian warrior images. Make more” (DY, 2001).

David Yeagley — “American Indian mascots and monikers should remain forever in American schools and universities” (DY, 2001).

So as a special tribute to Mr. Adopted Co-opted, BadEagle.org is pleased to announce the official release of our new mascot logo, “We Honor Bad Eagle Indian Apple,” which comes on white background or on black. Feel free to use these logos on your own sites and link back to this one as a banner. Please join us in bestowing this special commemoration upon the Indian Apple, a recognition that he (by his own arguments) can truly appreciate — perhaps as no one else would. Of course, there are good apples and bad apples. BadEagle.org offers this "mascot" logo on behalf of all Indian people and the "Bad" Apples we sometimes find along the Red Road, you know, road apples.

The Indian Apple (on white):

The Indian Apple (on black):


March 4, 2007

Puns and Dozes

from the Bad Eagle Journal

Instead of “Guns and Rises,” a sadly lame takeoff on Guns and Roses, how about Puns and Dozes (for the yawn factor)? Mr. Schmohawk’s continued word games, albeit immaturely played, put one to sleep. Why not Runs and Noses (a bit too slimy)? Well then, why not Nuns and Hoses? Now there’s a picture that wrestles the imagination. Or speaking of picture-taking Catholic priests, why not Sons and Poses, and then write about the church closings resulting from massive coverups of Christian rape? But no, little david is once again showing us his white dominionist face; my advice to you — when he SHOWS you his white dominionist face, BELIEVE him. Ignorance is no excuse when it comes to the Bumbanshee Warrior; he’s obviously not all together on this 'Christian love' thing.

David Yeagley — “Guns and Rises ... I say this to Christians: you have a choice. You can be a free Christian, or you can be a persecuted, imprisoned Christian. If you want to be free, it will cost something. Historically, it cost the Revolutionary War. It was the price of creating a new country” (DY, Mar. 4, 2007)

First, as you probably already know, the USA was not founded as a Christian nation at all, and the founders were Deists (or possibly Unitarians at best). Even a US Treaty was written and approved while George Washington was President, and signed into law under President Adams, that explicitly states the US was not Christian:
US Treaty—"As the Government of the United States of America is not in any sense founded on the Christian religion; as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion, or tranquillity, of Musselmen; and as the said States never have entered into any war or act of hostility against any Mehomitan nation, it is declared by the parties that no pretext arising from religious opinions shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countries" (US Treaty of Tripoli. In Article 11, 1796)

So for The Postiche Patriot to harp on this ‘Christian warrior’ nonsense supposedly coming from the founding of America, he’s not accounting for the facts of history. Like so many white dominionists, the on-the-pot patriot WISHES America were some fantasy warrior Christian nation (so he’d “fit in” rather than live as a boorish misfit). But you can’t win for losing on this one Average Savage. America is what it is, no matter how loudly you whimper, wishing it were different. Too bad whimpering warrior, you lose.

As for my own particular view on this so-called Christian call-to-arms, this Christian-backed immoral war with Iraq, and this Christian saber-rattling toward Iran, please refer to this earlier “Uncle Tomahawk” cartoon. Hey, why not simply abolish the constitution all together, and establish the ten commandments as the official government? yeah right (that’s sarcasm for the intellectually challenged, little david). Dominionists are warmongers plain-and-simple, without compassion, without heart, and without social intelligence. And, for what it’s worth, I count David A. Yeagley — Mr. Civil Whites — among them.

March 2, 2007

FYI on John Martin

Phone threats were made by:

John Martin
4207 Admirable Dr.
Rancho Palos Verdes, CA

Pseudonyms:
Blog Alias: "tallsoldier77"
MySpace Alias: "jswifthawk"
http://www.myspace.com/jswifthawk

Any problems contact:
Lomita Sheriff Station
(serving Rancho Palos Verdes)
26123 Narbonne Avenue
Lomita, CA 90717
310-539-1661

Yeagley Supporter John Martin Issues More Death Threats

It appears Brent Michael Davids was not the only person receiving death threats yesterday. Dr. Al Carroll reports that Martin made similar calls to him, which were similarly reported to the authorities. A partial quote is below; for the full report, GO HERE.

Originally posted by Dr. Al Carroll, 3-2-07

Dr. Al Carroll — "Visitors to this archive [http:www.davidyeagley.org] may remember John Martin as an unbalanced lunatic and imposter posing as a Gulf War veteran who issued several death threats from Badeagle.com and several more at Indianz.com. At Indianz he was kicked out. At Badeagle, Yeagley at first cheered him on. Then finally the other members of Badeagle had enough and urged him to quit embarassing himself and their forum. Another moderator sternly warned him and threatened to expel him, while others pointed out his many lies.

http://davidyeagley.blogspot.com/2006_11_01_davidyeagley_archive.html

http://indianz.com/board/post.asp?method=TopicQuote&TOPIC_ID=24833&FORUM_ID=5

Martin continues to be determined to make himself and Yeagley look deranged and unstable. He tracked down my PARENTS' home phone number, thinking it was mine, and called six times yesterday.

The first time I happened to be there..." (Al Carrol, Mar. 2, 2007)

Death Threats Issued by John Martin

from the Bad Eagle Journal

Brent Michael Davids received death threats on March 1st, 2007, by John Martin in response to the original post “Comanches Dishonored” (posted: 3-1-07, on www.badeagle.org), which included corrective information regarding Mr. John Martin’s exaggerated claims and the threats he has issued against other people he has disagreed with in the past.

It should be noted that the posted information did not include any photographs at all, but only links to preexisting web pages on other sites, and the posted information was entirely legal and within the permissions allowed under the current copyright laws. It should also be noted that John Martin did finally reach Brent Michael Davids on the phone and apologetically asked for the photo links of his wife and children removed, and Mr. Davids graciously responded by removing the links. At no time has Mr. Davids threatened or posted false information regarding John Martin or his family, and has responded as a decent fellow, though it appears that Mr. Martin's phone calls were designed to intimidate and threaten, which BadEagle.org regards as unreasonable and quite criminal. As of today, a formal complaint has been filed with the Saint Paul police department.

GO HERE TO LISTEN TO THE RECORDED PHONE MESSAGES

Call transcript of March 2, 2007

[answering machine]

Brent and the office of Blue Butterfly Group. Four saved messages. To listen to your messages press 1 [bleep]. First saved message, sent yesterday at 2:50 PM.

[John Martin]

Hey Brent you mother fucker. You’re fuckin’ dead, mother fucker. I know where you live you little shit. You think you’re fuckin’ so tough. Puttin’ shit on my fuckin’ family. You’re fuckin’ dead you mother fucker. I’ll be out there to kick your fuckin’ ass this weekend, you better watch your back mother fucker. You’re fuckin’ dead you little shit. Fuck you. [click]

[answering machine]

End of message. Erase, press 7. Save, press 9. [bleep] Re-saved. Sent yesterday at 3 PM.

[John Martin]

Hey Brent you fuckin’ faggot, you mother fucker you ass-kicking, you ass,ss, sucking mother fucker. You know what mother fucker? Thi,th,thi,is,this is the beginning of your fuckin’ the end of you mother fucker. You talk shit, you wanna talk some shit? Talk some shit to me you punk ass bitch. Come on mother fucker. You know what mother fucker? You better watch your back, I got people in fuckin’, in fuckin’ Minnesota. They’ll rip your fuckin’ heart out you little bitch. Talk shit about my family, why don’t you come talk shit to my face you mother fucker. You punk ass bitch. You fuckin punk ass mother fuckin’ bitch. Fuck you, you mother fucker. [click]

[answering machine]

End of message. Erase, press 7. Save, press 9. [bleep] Re-saved. Sent yesterday at 3:50 PM.

[John Martin]

Hey listen Brent. You got 48 hours to take that shit down you put down, you, you ah, those pictures you put of my family. I don’t give a fuck what the fuck you say about me, but you take that shit down in 48 hours or else I’m gonna come for you, mother fucker. You hear me? You got 48 hours to take that shit off. Otherwise, I’m comin’ for you mother fucker. I’m comin’ for you, fuckin’ bitch. [click]

[answering machine]

End of message. Erase, press 7. Save, press 9. [bleep] Re-saved. Sent yesterday at 4:13 PM.

[John Martin]

Pick up your fuckin’ phone you mother fucker and talk to me you bitch. Talk to me mother fucker, you fuckin’ bitch. [click]

[answering machine]

End of message. Erase, press 7. Save, press 9. [bleep] Re-saved. End of messages.